COVID couldn’t close this party
Another remarkable year in the stock market has come to a close. Much of the commentary in these pages will address the uncertainty that lies ahead. Before we do that, we should celebrate what 2021 achieved for investors.
The year began with a surge in COVID cases, but vaccinations, substantial government stimulus and a zero interest rate environment served to minimize COVID’s impact on the markets. The S&P 500 finished the year up 26.89%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average posted a respectable advance of 18.73%, while the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite managed to return 21.39%. Smaller stocks, represented by the Russell 2000, fared a little worse, scratching out a less robust 13.70% gain. Ordinarily that would be a handsome return, but 2021 expected more.
TINA and FOMO have been regular market participants since the Financial Crisis recovery began, and these two party animals continued to drink from the punch bowl in 2021. There Is No Alternative, TINA’s given name, refers to the stellar performance of equities in a zero rate environment. Fear Of Missing Out, or FOMO, is TINA’s highly emotional party companion. Together they really have caused quite a stir in the markets.
For the most part, Asian markets couldn’t keep pace with TINA and FOMO. Europe sure did. But nothing, it seems, could keep pace with oil, as the cost of a barrel of crude jumped over 50%. During the depths of COVID in 2020, a seller of crude oil actually had to pay the buyer roughly $40/barrel to get rid of the stuff. Yes, the seller paid the buyer. Now crude is over $80/barrel. Wow.
Fear of missing out is not a sound investment strategy, and there will again be alternatives, but for 2021, TINA and FOMO certainly did the trick. As we consider what awaits us in 2022, words like inflation, shortages and rising rates come to mind. Buckle up!
There is a lot of noise out there. Don’t be distracted.
It’s hard to believe that this miserable pandemic has been with us for nearly two years already. It is mildly depressing to think there is no obvious end in sight. And yet we soldier on, adjusting as best we can.
A lot has changed since COVID arrived. For one, there seem to be more rules now than there used to be. We must wear a mask in many public settings. We must present proof of vaccination to enter certain destinations. We must be vaccinated to work for many large companies and governments, and many of us are not even allowed in our office. Some of us are allowed back in our office, but only on select days. The same is true of schools, making the balance of work/life an even greater challenge for working parents. Having never been here before, no one knows the right answers. But we sure have come up with a lot of wrong ones.
It also seems we need to have more patience than we once did. We can still order our online purchases with next day delivery, but they don’t tell us which next day the package will actually ship. We have learned that cars, sofas and golf clubs are rarely in stock and may take months to arrive. We have become accepting of regular shortages of basic items in a seemingly prosperous economy. Who knew that supply chain management was even a job before COVID happened?
We behave differently too. We shake hands less and fist bump more. We hesitate before we hug. And we are overly suspicious of anyone that sneezes.
Many are investing differently as well. With more time and money on our hands, playing the stock market and cryptocurrencies has become like sport. It can provide thrill and entertainment, and potentially instant reward. It really has become akin to sports betting. “I’ll take the Chiefs -7, the moneyline on the Rams, and 5 S&P June 4,775 calls.”
For those of us old enough to remember, COVID in many ways has returned us to one of the more forgettable decades – the 1970’s. No, Soul Train and American Bandstand are not on the air again, but inflation, shortages and rising interest rates are back. We haven’t used these words together in serious conversation since, well, probably since the ‘70’s.
For investors, these are issues most haven’t faced before. Inflation was a serious problem in the ‘70’s, as it dramatically eroded the spending power of those living on fixed income. It is uncertain how many today are actually living on fixed income, since interest rates have been nearly zero for a decade. Maybe the Fed fixed that problem inadvertently. But inflation is still a tax on wage earners and savers. It is a gift to the indebted, like most governments. And it is a major contributor to a potentially new investment landscape.
Shortages are also a problem. We are told that our economy is quite robust, and by most traditional measures this is inarguable. Yet we have shortages of labor, raw materials, finished goods, transportation, fuel, and who knows what else. In many respects this feels more third world than first. How companies navigate these issues will, in large part, determine how productive our economy can remain.
Rising interest rates, if they persist, will also alter the investment landscape. For governments, companies and individuals that rely on debt, the cost of the debt is on the rise. This limits borrowing power for governments, profitability for companies and spending power for individuals. None of these are net positives for our economy.
Yet rates typically rise precisely because the economy is strong. If in fact this is the case, then bring on rising rates. Short term pain for long term gain is an acceptable trade-off.
The Federal Reserve is tasked with the dual mandate of promoting both maximum employment and price stability. The primary tool they have been handed by Congress is the ability to adjust short term interest rates. When the economy slows and unemployment rises, the Fed lowers rates. When the economy accelerates and unemployment declines, the Fed raises rates to tap the brakes and make sure things don’t get overheated.
You may recall that the definition of inflation is too much money chasing too few goods. For the last decade or so, the Fed has held short term rates at historically low levels, while adding new tools to their toolbox in the form of Quantitative Easing. The Fed now owns approximately a quarter of all U.S. government debt, plus enough mortgages to ensure those rates remain low as well. Ordinarily this would be inflationary. But these are not ordinary times. Yet, finally, these policies may indeed be promoting inflation.
The question waiting to be answered is whether the Fed is still in control of interest rates, or if the market is reasserting itself by sending rates higher. There is a nearby chart that shows the yield of the 10-year U.S. Treasury Bond for the past 60 years. The yield peaked in September 1981 at more than 15%. Since then, rates have been in a 40 year descent toward zero. The low yield to date was achieved in July 2020 at roughly 0.60%. At the time of this writing the yield stands at nearly 1.80%. The average yield over this 60 year span is 5.95%. We are not likely to get back to that level any time soon, as we haven’t seen it in more than 20 years.
Rates do seem poised to continue their rise. The Fed will no doubt pursue an orderly, well-telegraphed rate strategy, hoping to keep markets calm. The question is whether markets will fall in line.
That rates are rising is not a huge problem. After all, it is the sign of a healthy and growing economy. However, Fed policy has seemingly ignored the presence of economic growth and rates could now be coiled like a spring after being held artificially low for so long. A steeper than expected increase, coupled with all the other goings on, could create some turbulence investors haven’t faced in a while.
Companies and investors alike could potentially face a challenging environment. Being proactive, rather than reactive, seems like the better course of action. For companies, get your house in order. If you rely on debt, move from variable rates to fix and short term to long. This is likely prudent for individuals to do as well.
For investors, we suggest sticking with companies, not stock markets. Understand what you own, and try to own businesses whose success is not dependent upon things beyond their control. Look for businesses that have a track record of growth through nearly any economic cycle.
You may notice two charts nearby tracking earnings and price over time. The first chart is for the S&P 500, the second for Abbott Labs. Notice how closely price and earnings move together in each chart. The S&P 500 exhibits a more volatile earnings history than does Abbott Labs. Consequently, the price swings for the S&P 500 tend to be more volatile as well.
Tandem employs a time-tested discipline of seeking to own only those companies that produce consistent, repeatable growth over multiple economic environments. It is not always the best strategy for every market. It might not even be the very best strategy for any market! But limiting volatility during uncertain times has its benefits. At Tandem, we believe limiting volatility is one of the most important ingredients for consistent investment success.
Volatility makes most of us want to do the wrong thing at the wrong time for the wrong reason. We see prices high and rising and we fear we are missing out. Our emotions get the better of us, and we jump in, often causing us to buy high. Conversely, when prices are low and falling, our fear tells us to get out, and we sell low. This is not the sort of behavior that leads to successful investing.
There is a lot of noise out there. Don’t be distracted. Limit volatility and understand your risk. When things are nearly perfect, they rarely get better. Don’t be afraid to sell high, even though no one else is. And when things feel they can hardly get worse, they probably can’t. Buy low. Embrace volatility created by others’ emotions, not your own. The best time to buy is generally when few others are.
The opinions expressed are those of the Fund’s Sub-Adviser and are not a recommendation for the purchase or sale of any security.
The Standard & Poors 500 Index (S&P 500) is an index of 500 stocks. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a stock market index that tracks 30 large, publicly traded companies. The Nasdaq Composite Index is a market-cap weighted index of more than 2,500 companies listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange. The Russell 2000 index measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the US equity universe.
The Castle Tandem Fund’s position in Abbott Labs (ABT) as of December 31, 2021 represented 4.48% of Fund assets.
The Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses must be considered carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the Fund, and it may be obtained by calling 1-877-743-7820 or visiting www.castleim.com. Read it carefully before investing. Distributed by Rafferty Capital Markets, LLC Garden City, NY 11530.
Important Risk Information
The risks associated with the Fund are detailed in the Fund’s Prospectus. Investments in the Fund are subject to common stock risk, sector risk, and investment management risk. The Fund’s focus on large-capitalization companies subjects the Fund to the risks that larger companies may not be able to attain the high growth rates of smaller companies. Because the Fund may invest in companies of any size, its share price could be more volatile than a fund that invests only in large-capitalization companies. Fund holdings and asset allocations are subject to change and are not recommendations to buy or sell any security.